EDITORIAL DIRECTIVE DOUBLE-BLIND PEER REVIEW • Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Protocol

Review Process & Colloquium Deadlines

Operational schedule, submission milestones, and the collegiate double-blind evaluation procedure for ADC-RadCon 2027. Proffered abstracts are reviewed on a rolling basis, with formal editorial determination delivered within 10 business days of submission.

10 Days
Rolling Review Turnaround
Jan 31, 2027
Early Bird Cut-Off
Feb 28, 2027
Regular Abstract Cutoff
April 21–22
Colloquium Convenes (Paris)
Administrative Milestones

Critical Dates & Registration Windows

Submissions and registrations are processed according to strict academic cycles. Ensure abstracts and registration passes are secured prior to tier closures.

Active Window
Early Bird Registration
January 31, 2027
First-tier reduced registration rates for authors, clinical faculty, and research fellows.
Upcoming
Proffered Abstract Cutoff
February 28, 2027
Primary cutoff for regular oral podium defenses and printed scientific poster submissions.
Upcoming
Late-Breaking Submissions
March 15, 2027
Dedicated evaluation window reserved exclusively for late-breaking Phase I/II clinical trials.
Upcoming
Advanced Registration Cutoff
April 05, 2027
Final advanced online registration closing before on-site badge desk pricing in Paris.
Convenes
Colloquium Convenes
April 21–22, 2027
Executive sessions convene in Paris, France, with synchronous global webcast connectivity.
Editorial Workflow

The 10-Day Rolling Evaluation Pipeline

To expedite travel approvals and institutional funding requests, the Review Directorate operates a continuous evaluation pipeline.

01

Intake & Compliance Audit

Upon portal receipt, the secretariat audits word count (max 350 words), structural four-heading format, anonymization compliance, and ethical declarations.

02

Double-Blind Panel Assignment

Anonymized manuscripts are matched with two independent review specialists aligned with the chosen scientific track (Tracks 01–05).

03

Weighted Scoring & Review

Abstracts are evaluated across scientific rigor (35%), translational novelty (25%), clinical utility (25%), and clarity (15%) under collegiate peer review.

04

Editorial Determination (Day 10)

Formal notification letter issued via email detailing acceptance status, review score feedback, and allocated presentation format (Oral vs. Poster).

Determination Categories

Possible Editorial Outcomes

Category A

Accepted: Plenary Oral Podium Defense

Awarded to top-scoring investigations. Author is allocated a 15-minute plenary presentation (10-minute slide defense followed by 5 minutes of moderated Q&A) in Hall Alpha or Beta.

Category B

Accepted: Moderated Poster Presentation

Assigned to high-quality empirical studies. Author receives a dedicated display board in the central exhibition concourse and participates in moderated faculty poster walk sessions.

Category C

Revision Required / Resubmission

Returned to the corresponding author when data lacks clear quantification (e.g., missing RCY/RCP or IC50 values). Author is given 5 business days to provide amended text.

Fast-Track Visa Letters: Authors receiving formal Category A or B acceptance notices can immediately request an official, digitally signed Institutional Letter of Invitation from the Central Electronic Desk for French entry visa processing.

Review Directorate & Editorial Abstract Desk Convened by: Catalyst Colloquia Network • Central Inquiries: [email protected] • Review Status Queries: [email protected] • Paris, France (Hybrid Convening)
Scroll to Top